U+A architects on balancing between technology and concept design

Our current economic climate is accelerating development faster than ever before. This rapid growth depends on fast-paced projects and uncompromising design quality – a daunting dilemma for architects, and an ancient and intrinsic economic formula that has been incited by the current culture of instant gratification. There is an insatiable drive for the distillation of creative solutions to achieve this harmony between time and quality, while the architect’s internal struggle for perfection is ever haunting.

Surely if we were using the more traditional means of production for a project, we would require more time to reach a successful design. Fortunately, technology is an ever-evolving range of tools that helps us cope with creating this harmony, despite the varying impact it can have on people of different generations.

Some architects and designers who used to illustrate their ideas and concepts through their hand sketches and colours are now finding themselves forced to step into the world of BIM, or pushed to the wayside.
In general, though, technology unburdens the architect of tedious repetitive tasks, freeing up time and allowing for better focus on more successful and creative strategies.

Another advantage of digital advancements is computational design, which enables us to create multiple design options.

However the process towards the final design varies among professionals. Some are still insisting on their old methods and beliefs, while younger generations are purely technologically-driven. The best place to be is somewhere in the middle of the two, maintaining the heart and soul of the concept during the early stages of design while taking advantage of computational methods as we move into the production stages.

The one danger that comes along with high-tech design processes is losing one’s ability of critical analysis while problem-solving and blindly relying on software. We have personally found it important to distinguish using computation as a tool to better our designers from letting its limitations take over our projects.

Designers and architects must also not forget the importance of thinking algorithmically, and finding a logical process that can be transformed into an ideal design. Such a process is improved with each new experience, a result of exposure and interest in computer-aided design. However, creative thinking should remain, as always, free of technology.

By Ahmad Hammad and Narges Rowshanzamir of U+A

This entry was posted in Voices and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to U+A architects on balancing between technology and concept design

  1. Osama Warid says:

    Actually the topic very interested because it is engaging and using the technology for the benefit of design, also it is so important to such process to think how formulate whole project life cycle between stage 0 of client strategic definition up to stage 6 at least from RIBA plan of work, in order to maintain productivity and quality enhancement in the predecessor and successor processes, and that could be achieved through training and exposing the awareness of using the technology, where significant number of clients and contractors still not aware about the recent technology related to the construction industry.

  2. Asif Gulzar says:

    Many Congratulations!

    Architect is that who always convert idea into Realism and in the modern industry “Concept into Construction”.

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *